We Save You Time and Resources By Curating Relevant Information and News About Cybersecurity.

best-cyber-security-news

Protect Your Systems From Owasp Failures Now

By Tom Seest

How Do You Identify OWASP Authentication Failures?

At BestCybersecurityNews, we help entrepreneurs, solopreneurs, young learners, and seniors learn more about cybersecurity.

OWASP identification and authentication failure is an inherent flaw in digital frameworks that allows persistent system-level threats to assume a user’s identity or steal sensitive data.
Previously referred to as broken authentication, identification, and authentication failures have fallen from number two in 2017’s OWASP top ten list to seven in 2021. CWEs present in this category include CWE-297: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch and CWE-287: Improper Authentication.

How Do You Identify OWASP Authentication Failures?

How Do You Identify OWASP Authentication Failures?

Are Your Authentication Practices Vulnerable to OWASP Failure?

The OWASP Top 10 is a list of the ten most frequent security risks that affect web applications. It assists developers in understanding their software’s most vulnerable areas and crafting applications that are secure against attackers.
OWASP is an open community dedicated to improving software security. They publish the OWASP Top 10 and other resources on their website, plus organize local chapters and conferences around the world in order to raise awareness about cybersecurity topics.
Insufficient authentication is a widespread vulnerability in many web applications. It can lead to compromised accounts and the exposure of sensitive data to malicious actors, leading to identity theft, data breaches, and money laundering activities.
This vulnerability can be caused by inadequate user authentication or session management controls, as well as weak passwords used on new accounts or those reused from past accounts.
Authentication is a critical element of any application’s security. Protecting usernames and passwords from malicious users should be the top priority for any developer.
However, this can be challenging. Some web applications use default usernames, require password rotation processes, or allow multiple usernames per account.
Developers and end users alike may encounter issues due to these practices. They could lead to broken authentication attempts that allow an intruder to break into a user’s account and access their data without authorization.
Testing for and identifying insufficient authentication is important. You can do this by testing your application’s security controls to confirm they work as intended. For instance, if cookies are being used to confirm a user’s identity or session, ensure they expire properly after an established period.

Are Your Authentication Practices Vulnerable to OWASP Failure?

Are Your Authentication Practices Vulnerable to OWASP Failure?

Are Your Online Sessions Vulnerable to Hijacking?

Session hijacking is an attack that allows hackers to gain unauthorized access to a user’s session. This type of cyberattack can have devastating effects on businesses, resulting in losses, damage to reputation, legal liabilities, and more.
Sessions are essential components of web applications and serve to synchronize subsequent connections. When a user logs into an application, a temporary session ID is generated on the server which serves to identify their session. Without adequate security measures in place, however, these sessions could be easily hijacked by malicious actors.
An attacker who successfully hijacks a session can use the information it contains to gain access to various web applications, such as financial databases, customer records, and line-of-business applications that store sensitive intellectual property.
A successful session hijacking attack can result in the unauthorized disclosure of personal information or money taken directly from bank accounts. Furthermore, it could be utilized to launch attacks against other users and organizations as well.
Hackers frequently take advantage of vulnerabilities in web applications or servers to steal user session tokens, which they then use to hijack a user’s session. This technique is known as cross-site scripting (XSS).
Another method is packet sniffing, which utilizes unencrypted network traffic to uncover the user’s session ID. This technique is commonly employed on public Wi-Fi networks and websites that don’t encrypt data sent between browsers and site servers.
OWASP also recommends a range of other security measures to prevent session hijacking, such as strong authentication and proper session management. These can reduce the likelihood of this attack and other types of cyberattacks.

Are Your Online Sessions Vulnerable to Hijacking?

Are Your Online Sessions Vulnerable to Hijacking?

Are Your Systems Vulnerable to Insufficient Logging?

Insufficient logging and monitoring are a serious security flaw that hinders an organization’s capacity to detect and respond to threats. This could include data theft, malware attacks, privilege escalation, or denial of service attacks.
Insufficient logs can be caused by a variety of issues, such as insufficient logging infrastructure or improper monitoring processes. These issues can negatively affect an organization’s capacity to detect and protect sensitive data, as well as its capacity to abide by regulatory requirements.
An example of inadequate logging is when an application fails to record events that could be used to detect security flaws. For instance, if an application fails to log failed login attempts, hackers can exploit this flaw and gain access to your system.
An inadequate logging system can also prevent organizations from adhering to industry regulations such as PCI DSS and HIPAA. Furthermore, it makes it harder to monitor suspicious activities, leading to slower incident response times.
Organizations that wish to increase their logging should implement a central log management system that collects and analyzes logs from various systems and applications. They should also enforce a backup and encryption policy for their logs.
Another way to guarantee adequate logging is to regularly perform penetration testing on your application for OWASP identification and authentication failures. Doing this allows you to identify security gaps and implement effective solutions to repair them.
Inadequate logging and monitoring pose a serious threat to an organization’s security, but they’re also one of the easiest vulnerabilities to remedy. Through automation, constant checkups, and robust logging and monitoring systems, organizations can quickly prevent these issues from arising.

Are Your Systems Vulnerable to Insufficient Logging?

Are Your Systems Vulnerable to Insufficient Logging?

Are Your Authentication Measures Vulnerable to OWASP’s Insecure Design?

Insecure Design, introduced by OWASP in 2021, is a new category that addresses design flaws that could cause application failures that expose sensitive information or compromise web applications.
OWASP defines insecure design as vulnerabilities caused by inadequate or nonexistent control design. Unlike insecure implementation, which may also lead to vulnerabilities, insecure design arises from either an oversight in security measures or misconfigured code.
When creating an application, it’s essential to avoid several design and architectural flaws. These include inadequate separation between entities with differing access rights and privileges, broken access control mechanisms, as well as neglecting proper isolation of application processes, resources, and functionalities.
These security vulnerabilities can be exploited by malicious individuals to intercept user input, alter the application logic or access sensitive information. They become especially hazardous if your application contains authentication and identification features like user login.
A common design flaw insecure products is the lack of proper separation between domains and environments. This provides an attacker with access to multiple environments, widening their attack surface area.
This insecure design flaw may not be as common as some of the other Top 10 risks, but it’s nonetheless critical to address. It underscores how security has become increasingly integrated into design processes – an indication that security must not be left to chance.
At each stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), security should be taken into account. This involves employing threat modeling, secure design patterns and principles, as well as reference architectures. Integrating these practices into the development process can significantly boost an application’s native security.

Are Your Authentication Measures Vulnerable to OWASP's Insecure Design?

Are Your Authentication Measures Vulnerable to OWASP’s Insecure Design?

Are Your Security Measures Failing? A Closer Look at OWASP’s Authentication Flaws

Security misconfiguration is one of the most prevalent vulnerabilities in web applications. It ranks #6 on OWASP’s top 10 list and can have serious repercussions for cloud infrastructure, network services, platforms, database servers, and frameworks alike.
According to OWASP, security misconfiguration is defined as “failing to implement all security controls for a server or web application, or incorrectly implementing those controls.
At any level of the stack, this can happen. This includes network services, platforms, web servers, application servers, databases, frameworks, custom code and pre-installed virtual machines or containers.
Many businesses struggle to avoid security misconfigurations, particularly in multi-cloud and hybrid-cloud environments. This is often due to the complexity of software and the lack of security tools that can quickly identify these mistakes.
Security misconfiguration can enable hackers to exploit an application for various reasons, such as accessing user accounts and exposing data. It also exposes network and information security controls like firewalls and VPNs, leading to potential attacks on these networks and systems.
Common security misconfigurations include not disabling default accounts with well-known passwords, leaving debugging features enabled in production that show stack traces or error messages to users, and enabling or installing unnecessary ports, services, pages, accounts, or privileges – especially when using open-source code or frameworks as these often come with default configurations that compromise security. It’s essential to keep all software up to date so there are no flaws or outdated versions present; this also helps guarantee your security controls are up-to-date and address the latest threats.

Are Your Security Measures Failing? A Closer Look at OWASP's Authentication Flaws

Are Your Security Measures Failing? A Closer Look at OWASP’s Authentication Flaws

Please share this post with your friends, family, or business associates who may encounter cybersecurity attacks.